USPTO serial 78228919
PLAY THINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLAY THINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy D. Pecsenye, Esquire
TIMOTHY D PECSENYE ESQ BLANK ROME LLPONE LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA PA, 19103U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | PET TOYS | ACTIVE | Nov 19, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2005 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |