Drawing for MALIBU

USPTO serial 78228943

MALIBU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2861632Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 6, 2004
Examiner
TIERNEY, MARGERY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with MALIBU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary A. Clark, Esq.

Gary A. Clark, Esq. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP333 South Hope Street, 48th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90071UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Insect repellentsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 13, 2003
011Devices for dispensing and dispersing insect repellentsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 13, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2011C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jul 7, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 10, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 9, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 2, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 27, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 25, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 6, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 6, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Apr 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 9, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 2, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 23, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 23, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2003AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance