USPTO serial 78229029
LORO PARQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LORO PARQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PUERTO DE LA CRUZ (S.C. Tenerife), ES
PUERTO DE LA CRUZ (S.C. Tenerife), ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Fields, Amy J. Benjamin and Abigail Rubinstein
Paul Fields, Amy J. Benjamin and Abigail Rubinstei Darby & Darby P.C.P.O. Box 770, Church Street StationNew York, NY 10008-0770UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | RECREATION PARK SERVICES; EDUCATIONAL AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING MOTIVATIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL SPEAKERS; ORGANIZING COMMUNITY SPORTING AND CULTURAL EVENTS; ANIMAL TRAINING AND AMUSEMENT PARKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2007 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |