CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for OCTILLA

USPTO serial 78229472

OCTILLA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3074227Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 28, 2006
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with OCTILLA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sonya del Peral

Sonya del Peral Drohan Lee Kelley LLP489 5th AvenueNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Telephone calling cards, not magnetically encodedSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 29, 2003
036Telephone calling cards servicesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 6, 2003
038Telephone communication servicesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 6, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Feb 4, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 28, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 13, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 14, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jan 14, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 21, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 10, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 10, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 11, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 19, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 31, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 31, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 31, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 11, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 11, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 17, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 11, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance