Drawing for IBERSILVA

USPTO serial 78229585

IBERSILVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IBERSILVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KEITH KLINE

KEITH KLINE THE KLINE LAW FIRM161 LITTLE POND LNPALMYRA, VA 22963-5161UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Procurement, namely, purchasing wood and cellulose for others; business management services for commercial or industrial companies; personnel placement and recruitment; evaluation of standing timber; conducting marketing studies; marketing research; and export and import agencies featuring wood and celluloseACTIVE—
040Treatment of materials, namely, woodworking, laminating, planing, grinding wood and wood boards, and cutting of woodACTIVE—
042Engineering; technical consultation and research in the field of environmental protection; quality control for others; conducting of feasability studies; research and development of new products for others; material testing; cartography and mapping; and land surveyingACTIVE—
044Farming equipment rental, tree surgery, plant care services, and plant nurseriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 18, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 4, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 19, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 23, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 22, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 17, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance