USPTO serial 78229595
ALERTIS MEDICAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALERTIS MEDICAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Moore
Thomas J. Moore BACON & THOMAS, PLLC625 Slaters LaneFourth FloorAlexandria, VA 22314-1176Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | SENSORS, MONITORS AND BIOSENSORS FOR SURGICAL AND MEDICAL USE IN DETECTING AND MONITORING TISSUE ISCHAEMIA AND IN MONITORING AND ANALYZING A PATIENT'S VITAL FUNCTIONS; SURGICAL AND MEDICAL DEVICES FOR THE PURPOSE OF MONITORING AND ANALYZING A PATIENT'S VITAL FUNCTIONS; SURGICAL AND MEDICAL DEVICES FOR USE IN DETECTING AND MONITORING TISSUE ISCHAEMIA; SURGICAL AND MEDICAL DEVICES FOR USE IN BIOPSY PROCEDURES, NAMELY, BIOPSY GUNS, NEEDLES, HOLDERS AND INTRODUCERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |