USPTO serial 78229643
MAJI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAJI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
T. Maria Lam, Esq.
JOHN L WELCH ESQ FOLEY HOAG LLPSEAPORT WORLD TRADE CTR W155 SEAPORT BLVDBOSTON, MA 02210Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software framework for facilitating the development of federated network environments for distributed, nomadic, pervasive and embedded computing systems, namely, software development tools; software framework for enabling disparate devices, appliances, software and systems to dynamically authenticate, integrate and inter-operate in a uniform manner, namely, LAN operating software, VPN operating software, USB operating software and WAN operating software; software framework for facilitating the development of distributed, nomadic software applications and services that can operate in and across dynamic, semi-permanent, mobile or volatile network environments, all of the foregoing excluding computer programs for use in the field of manufacturing and production control; and excluding computer programs for analyzing and presenting electronic text to improve reading; and excluding computer software programming tools for automating the administrative, financial, and clinical records of health care organizations; and excluding computer software programming tools for automating the administrative and financial records of companies and organizations, and excluding goods closely related to data processing services for others, namely, automating the administrative and financial records of companies and organizations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MAJITEK INTERNATIONAL PTE. LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by MAJITEK INTERNATIONAL PTE. LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Pierce IPDC Pte Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MAJI
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |