Drawing for PAETEC COMMUNICATIONS

USPTO serial 78229720

PAETEC COMMUNICATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2988888Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 30, 2005
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with PAETEC COMMUNICATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Margaret M. Cassady

ROBERT P LANE JR BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC17TH FL1 LINCOLN CTRSYRACUSE, NY 13202-1355

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunications services, namely, local, long distance, and international telephone and facsimile services; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; electronic mail and voice mail services; wireless digital messaging services; telephone voice messaging; web messaging; electronic store-and-forward messaging and messaging services; electronic data transmission packet services; integrated digital network telecommunications services, namely, ISDN services, private line services and virtual private network services; transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic, cable, and satellite transmissions; worldwide switched text and message transmission servicesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 17, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 28, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jun 22, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 1, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 21, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 21, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 14, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 30, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 7, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 22, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance