Drawing for LYCOLUT

USPTO serial 78230128

LYCOLUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LYCOLUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SUSAN T BROWN

SUSAN T BROWN MAYER BROWN ROWE & MAW LLP1909 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-1101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001natural or synthetic chemicals used in the manufacture of pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations, food, food supplements, beverages, colorants, dietary supplements and animal feedACTIVE—
002colorants for use in the manufacture of pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations, food, food supplements, beverages, dietary supplements and animal feedACTIVE—
029milk and dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; and edible oils and fatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 10, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 2, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Aug 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 14, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 16, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance