USPTO serial 78230449
LEGEND: TOTAL WAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEGEND: TOTAL WAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Southwater Nr. Horsham, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven Mancinelli
STEVEN MANCINELLI CODISPOTI & MANCINELLI, LLP111 JOHN ST STE 800NEW YORK NY, 10038U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers, computer hardware, and computer products, namely, computer game disks, computer game programs and software, multimedia software recorded on a CD-ROM featuring computer games, computer game software that is downloadable from a global computer network, computer firmware for use in connection with computer games, computer mouse pads; electronic games apparatus, namely, computer and video game cartridges, video game cartridges for hand-held electronic game units, computer game cassettes and tapes, and computer game controllers and disks; video game machines for use with television sets; video game cartridges; video game programs; pre-recorded video tapes featuring computer games and children's' programs featuring animated characters based on computer games; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of magazines, journals and newsletters in the field of computer games information; interactive entertainment software for playing games in the nature of computer game software; sound and video recordings featuring music and animation for use with computer games; pre-recorded magnetic data carriers featuring television programs and films featuring information on computer games and animated characters based on computer games, cinematographic films featuring information on computer games and animated characters based on computer games, motion picture films for broadcast on television featuring action, adventure, historical documentary drama and game shows and; pre-record discs featuring computer games; in International Class 9. | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Games, toys and playthings, namely, board games, action skill games, card games, hand-held units for playing electronic games; toy action figures and accessories therefore, dolls and accessories therefore; toy vehicles and electronically operated toy vehicles; playsets for dolls and toy action figures and cases for play accessories; toy craft kits comprising molds and molding compounds for making toy figures; toy model vehicles and related accessories sold as units; in International Class 28. | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing online computer and video games; entertainment in the nature of on-going television and radio programs featuring information on computer and video games, and children's programs featuring animated action characters based on computer video games; production and editing of digital and motion picture films, radio programs and television programs; amusement arcade services; in International Class 41. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 4, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |