USPTO serial 78230471
ASCENT MEDIA EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3308047Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 9, 2007
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ASCENT MEDIA EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
SANTA MONICA, CA
SANTA MONICA, CA
SANTA MONICA, CA
ENGLEWOOD, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victor K. Sapphire
Victor K. Sapphire Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2300Los Angeles, CA 90071UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | DIGITAL MEDIA CONTENT DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, NAMELY SATELLITE TRANSMISSION SERVICES, MICROWAVE TRANSMISSION SERVICES, FIBER-OPTIC TRANSMISSION SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING CONNECTIONS TO A DIGITAL NETWORK FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DIGITIZED AUDIO/VISUAL DATA, DOCUMENTS AND DATABASE INFORMATION, OPTICAL TRANSFER AND DIGITAL DISTRIBUTION OF DIGITAL MEDIA CONTENT VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, PROVIDING STREAMING VIDEO SERVICES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 18, 2006 |
| 039 | DIGITAL STORAGE OF DATA, NAMELY, DIGITAL STORAGE OF MOTION PICTURE FILMS, VIDEO TAPES AND DIGITIZED DATA AND INFORMATION WHICH MAY BE ACCESSED OR RETRIEVED ONLINE, ELECTRONIC STORAGE OF VIDEO, AUDIO, NUMERIC AND DOCUMENTARY DATA, PROVIDING DIGITAL IMAGERY STORAGE SERVICES AND DIGITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, THE ARCHIVING, SEARCHING AND RETRIEVAL OF DIGITAL MEDIA IN ALL DIGITAL MEDIA FORMATS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 18, 2006 |
| 040 | DIGITAL PACKAGING OF DATA FOR TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION, NAMELY, DIGITIZING AND DATA COMPRESSION SERVICES FOR NUMERIC, DOCUMENTARY AND DATABASE DATA, MOTION PICTURE FILM AND VIDEO COLOR CORRECTION SERVICES, MOTION PICTURE FILM AND VIDEO DIGITIZING AND DATA COMPRESSION SERVICES, DIGITIZING AND SCANNING OF STILL IMAGES AND MOVING IMAGES, DIGITAL IMAGE MANIPULATION SERVICES, BROADCAST STANDARDS CONVERSION, CLOSED CAPTIONING AND SUBTITLING SERVICES, ENCODING OF INTERACTIVE DATA, LAUGH TRACK INTEGRATION, SOUND EFFECTS MIXING, MEDIA CONTENT ASSEMBLY SERVICES, NAMELY, PRE-COMPILING OF MEDIA CONTENT, SYNDICATED PROGRAMMING PREPARATION, INTEGRATION OF COMMERCIAL/PROMOTION/BILLBOARD/WARNING AND LOGO ELEMENTS FOR BROADCAST TELEVISION, PREPARATION OF MEDIA FOR STREAMING DELIVERY, namely, encryption, watermarking, formatting, and forward error correction of media content; DIGITAL ENCODING AND TRANSCODING services for others; MEDIA FORMAT CONVERSION SERVICES FOR OTHERS, namely, CONVERSION OF FILM AND VIDEO TAPE TO ONE ANOTHER | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 18, 2006 |
| 042 | Conversion of film and video tape to digital media formats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 18, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ascent Media Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ASCENT MEDIA GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ASCENT MEDIA GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ASCENT MEDIA GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ASCENT MEDIA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ASCENT MEDIA EXPRESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 3, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 1, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |