USPTO serial 78230577
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Advanced Biochemical Corporation
Oakville, Ontario, CA
Advanced Biochemical Corporation
Oakville, Ontario, CA
Advanced Biochemical Corporation
Oakville, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Midge M. Hyman
MIDGE M HYMAN COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ENZYMES FOR PROCESSING OF STARCH, CELLULOSE, WASTE, WATER AND DETERGENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |