USPTO serial 78230592
HARLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HARLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Eyewear-Sunglasses and Goggles-Safety | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |