Drawing for THE HAIRCOLORXPERTS

USPTO serial 78230974

THE HAIRCOLORXPERTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, KARLA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE HAIRCOLORXPERTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH C. WASCH

JOSEPH C WASCH VICE PRESIDENT & GENERAL COUNSEL4850 W PROSPECT RDFORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Full line of hair color preparations, namely, hair dyes, hair bleaching preparations, hair color removers; a full line of non-medicated hair care styling preparations, namely, shampoo, conditioner, styling spray, gels, and hair spray; a full line of non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, foundation, powder, blush, eye shadows, eye pencils, eye liners, mascara, lipsticks and lip glossACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 6, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 13, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 24, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance