CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for FLEURY

USPTO serial 78231044

FLEURY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3098780Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 30, 2006
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLEURY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S EGBERT HARRISON & EGBERT412 MAIN STREET7TH FLOORHOUSTON, TX 77002

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair products, namely, shampoo, conditioner, hair styling gel, hair sprays, hair bleaching preparations, hair coloring preparations, hair removal preparations; deodorants for personal use; cosmetics, namely, lipstick, lip liner, foundation, blush, eye shadow, mascara, eyeliner; skin care products, namely, facial cleanser, facial toner, facial moisturizers, skin lotion, hand lotion, eye cream, makeup removal cream, beauty masks; fragrance products, namely, cologne, eau de toilette, perfumeSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDFeb 6, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2011C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Feb 3, 2011CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 28, 2011CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Oct 19, 2010PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 30, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 14, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Feb 27, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 27, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 27, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 23, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 7, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 19, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 28, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 3, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 4, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance