USPTO serial 78231161
COLOMBIAN COFFEE SHOP CAFE EL TINTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COLOMBIAN COFFEE SHOP CAFE EL TINTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Henry H. Skillman
HENRY H SKILLMAN DANN, DORFMAN, HERRELL & SKILLMAN1601 MARKET ST STE 2400PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2307UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee; grain and chicory based coffee substitutes; tea, cocoa, sugar, tapioca; sago and cereal based snack foods; bread and pastries; confectionery products, namely, cakes, cookies, pies and flavored ices | ABANDONED | — |
| 043 | Restaurant services, featuring both eat-in and carry out; eat-in and take-out restaurant services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Colombian Coffee Shop, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by Colombian Coffee Shop, S.L.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named COLOMBIAN COFFEE SHOP CAFE EL TINTO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |