USPTO serial 78231236
AQUA STOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AQUA STOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory H. Guillot
GREGORY H GUILLOT GREGORY H GUILLOT PC13455 NOEL RD STE 1000DALLAS, TX 75240-6814UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | ATHLETIC GLOVES, ATHLETIC MITTENS, AND WATERPROOF INSERT LINERS SOLD AS A COMPONENT OF ATHLETIC GLOVES AND ATHLETIC MITTENS, ALL FOR USE IN OUTDOOR SPORTING ACTIVITIES, NAMELY, SKIING AND SKI RACING, SNOW BOARDING AND SNOWBOARD RACING, SNOWMOBILING AND SNOWMOBILE RACING, BOBSLEDDING AND SNOWMOBILE RACING, BOBSLEDDING AND BOBSLED RACING, DOG SLEDDING AND DOG SLED RACING, LUGING, BICYCLING AND BICYCLE RACING, SAILING AND SAILBOAT RACING, BIATHLON COMPETITIONS, ICE-CLIMBING, MOUNTAINEERING, HUNTING, FISHING, AND ADVENTURE TRIPS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 16, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |