Drawing for FAMILY GRADE

USPTO serial 78231306

FAMILY GRADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COGGINS, ROBERT H
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FAMILY GRADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Diliberti

MARK J DILIBERTI FOLEY & LARDNERSTE 3800777 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202-5306

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Vehicular entertainment systems and electronics comprising fixed, removable and interchangeable combinations of control units in the nature of radio head controls or audio and video controls integrated into the instrument panel, audio and video controls integrated into overhead consoles audio and video controls integrated into floor consoles, and audio and video controls integrated into seatbacks, wireless control units in the nature of infra red (IR) and radio frequency (RF) remote controls, infra red and radio frequency headphones, infra red personal entertainment switching devices, infra red and radio frequency remote controls for Internet access, video displays in the nature of liquid crystal displays (LCD), organic light emitting diode displays, vacuum florescent (VF) displays for audio, video and HVAC faceplate controls, video monitors, audio output devices in the nature of speakers and headphones, analog and digital audio and video players tape players, VCRs, CD players DVD players, MP3 players audio CD's DVD audio, super audio CD, CDR/RW media, and Internet download, audio and video recorders, hard drives, memory sticks, computers, devices for connecting to global communication devices, namely, computers, cellular phone connection, Bluetooth or 801.11 wireless connection within the vehicle, remote controls, television signals (terrestrial and satellite) antennae and processing systems, headphones, gaming systems comprised of CD, DVD and hard disc players and memory devices, video screen (LCD and OLED) and remote controls (IR and RF), and navigation systems comprised of LCD display or monitor, DVD or hard disc mapping database, global positioning systems (GPS) menu and controls, GPS antennae.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2004GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance