USPTO serial 78231507
RATCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MADDEN, ANNE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RATCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond G. Areaux, Esq. (#33,643)
RAYMOND G AREAUX ESQ #33 643 CARVER, DARDEN, KORETZKY, TESSIER, FINN1100 POYDRAS ST STE 2700NEW ORLEANS LA, 70163U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Tool kits for paint ball, comprising hex wrenches, pliers, screwdriver, O-ring pick, and crescent wrench | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Protective glasses, and safety goggle case | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | Ammunition carry bags; ammunition holders; camouflage covers for firearms; cheek pads; combination weapon holders, namely, holders for ammunition, goggles, face masks, air tanks, ammunition loaders, squeegees and gun barrel plugs; firearm accessories, namely, gun cases, bipods and parts therefore; grenade holders; nylon belts for holding firearm cartridges, shells and shots; pistol holsters; rifle slings; scope covers for firearms; shooting mats; gun barrel swab; gun barrel squeegee; gun barrel blocker; gun barrel kit comprising a case containing variously sized gun barrels; gun barrel system, comprising a case containing variously sized gun barrels; gun barrels; breech knob; gun gas cartridges; gun gas tanks; guns; gun sight; gun upgrades; gun triggers; gun grips; gun cases; gun slings; tank covers; and pistol holders | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Combination nylon belts containing paint ball guns with holders attached to the belt, namely holders for goggles, face masks, air tanks, ammunition loaders, squeegees and gun barrel plugs; paint ball gun slings; paint ball bags; paint balls; paint grenades; paint ball cockers; paint ball sleeves; paint ball haulers; paint ball hoppers; paint pellets; pressure regulators for paint ball guns and markers; chest and back protectors and elbow protectors for sports; paint ball game markers; barrel squeegees for paint ball game markers; skateboard decks; skateboards; smokestack for paint ball guns and markers; stocks for paint ball guns and markers; tool boxes for paint ball; knee protectors; loaders; neck guards; shin pads all for use in sports; inflatable bunkers for use in paint ball games; paint ball electronic markers; tune-up kits, comprising replacement parts for paint ball markers; pneumatic paint ball gun starter package, comprising paint ball marker, gun gas tank, gun gas cartridge, barrel plug, wrenches, squeegee, and oil; electric paint ball gun starter package, comprising paint ball marker, battery, battery charger, barrel plug, wrenches, squeegee, and oil | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Kalencom Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by The Kalencom Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named RATCO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 8, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 4, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |