USPTO serial 78231579
PACIFIC'S FINEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 8, 2005
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PACIFIC'S FINEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Tigard, OR
Portland, OR
Portland, OR
Portland, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Cohen
Michael A. Cohen SCHWABE WILLIAMSON & WYATT, P.C.1211 SW Fifth AvenueSuites 1500-2000PORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Canned, frozen, pouch, aseptic, and non-perishable foods, namely, peanut butter, grapefruit, mandarins, peaches, pears, pineapple, tropical fruit, fruit bits, potato flakes and granulars, artichokes, baby corn, corn, bamboo, water chestnuts, mushrooms, olives, peppers, pimentos, stir-fry vegetables, boiled clams, crab, mackerel, sardines, smoked baby clams, smoked mussels, smoked oysters, and tuna | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 24, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bridgewell Resources LLC
- Other trademarks owned by North Pacific Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by North Pacific Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by North Pacific Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named PACIFIC'S FINEST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |