Drawing for WORLD'S WORST DRIVER

USPTO serial 78231781

WORLD'S WORST DRIVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WORLD'S WORST DRIVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael S. Hargis

MICHAEL S HARGIS KING & SCHICKLI, PLLC247 N BROADWAYLEXINGTON KY, 40507 1058U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment; entertainment by television, radio and Internet; interactive entertainment services provided via the Internet or other computer networks; provision of news and of information relating to entertainment, music, television and movies; production, presentation, distribution, syndication, networking and rental of television programmes, radio programmes, films, videos, sound/video recordings and of electronic publications; production of shows and live events; organisation of competitions; organisation of exhibitions; publication and publishing services; electronic publishing services; electronic games and services provided by means of the Internet; providing on-line electronic publications; providing digital music from the Internet; providing digital music from MP3 Internet web sites; downloading of television programmes, radio programmes, films, videos, sound images or data from the Internet or other computer networks; consultancy, information and advisory services relating to the aforesaid.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 31, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 31, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 28, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 16, 2005GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 16, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 13, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 13, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 12, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 26, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance