USPTO serial 78231842
YOGA GRIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 2005
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with YOGA GRIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Farley I Weiss
FARLEY I WEISS WEISS, MOY & HARRIS PC4204 N BROWN AVESCOTTSDALE, AZ 85251-3914UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Yoga gloves and booties designed to prevent slippage and protect hands and feet while practicing yoga | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 29, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 10, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |