USPTO serial 78232346
ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Turgeon
MICHAEL J TURGEON VEDDER, PRICE, KAUFMAN & KAMMHOLZ222 N LASALLE ST STE 2600CHICAGO, IL 60601-1003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Outsourcing in the field of computer network systems, computer software applications and telecommunications | ABANDONED | Aug 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 21, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 21, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |