USPTO serial 78232380
CHIEF ACADEMIC OFFICER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHIEF ACADEMIC OFFICER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas E. Kocovsky, Jr.
THOMAS E KOCOVSKY JR FAY, SHARPE, FAGAN, MINNICH & MCKEE, LLP1100 SUPERIOR AVE SEVENTH FLCLEVELAND OH, 44114 2518U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PUBLICATIONS, MAGAZINES, AND NEWSLETTERS FOR SUPERINTENDENTS, PRINCIPALS, COUNSELORS, CENTRAL OFFICE ADMINISTRATORS, DIRECTORS OF INSTRUCTION, DIRECTORS OF CURRICULUM, DIRECTORS OF TESTING AND ASSESSMENT, BUILDING PRINCIPALS, GUIDANCE COUNSELORS, OTHER INSTRUCTIONAL DECISION MAKERS, AND PARENTS, FEATURING ARTICLES ON TOPICS RELATING TO EDUCATION AND ACADEMICS INCLUDING KNOWLEDGE, KNOW-HOW, RESEARCH, AND TIPS FROM EXPERTS IN EDUCATION, EDUCATIONAL POLICY ISSUES, TRENDS IN EDUCATION, AND OTHER ARTICLES RELATING TO EDUCATION, ACADEMICS, AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF EDUCATIONAL AND ACADEMIC FACILITIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |