Drawing for SENSORY TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 78232511

SENSORY TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENSORY TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CRAIG R. MILES

CR MILES1 OLD TOWN SQ STE 200BFORT COLLINS, CO 80524UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Interactive liquid hand and body soap using time released sensorial indicia to indicate maximum efficacy; Cosmetics using time released sensorial indicia to indicate maximum efficacy; and non-medicated hair care products, namely, shampoos and conditioners using time released sensorial indicia to indicate maximum efficacyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Jan 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2006INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Aug 7, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 2, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 30, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2003CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance