Drawing for Serial No. 78232542

USPTO serial 78232542

Serial No. 78232542

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with Serial No. 78232542?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANNE SEELIG

ANNE SEELIG WU & KAO PLLC747 3RD AVE 22ND FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Cruise line service featuring cruises in the OrientACTIVEJan 1, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 15, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 15, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 26, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Dec 20, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 15, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance