USPTO serial 78232990
APPLE-MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2995775Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2005
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with APPLE-MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KEARNY, NJ
Venice, FL
Venice, FL
Venice, FL
Venice, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald J. Baron, Esq.
Ronald J. Baron, Esq. HOFFMANN & BARON, LLP6900 Jericho TurnpikeSyosset, NY 11791UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutritional supplements prepared with extracts of apples | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 28, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PHARMACHEM LABORATORIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Bio-Nutra Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Bio-Nutra Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Mann, Doug
- Other trademarks owned by Mann, Doug
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named APPLE-MAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |