USPTO serial 78233542
SAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, LAURIEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
2100 Copenhagen S, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristina M. Foudray, John A. Clifford
KRISTINA M FOUDRAY JOHN A CLIFFORD MERCHANT & GOULD PC3200 IDS CTR 80 S 8TH STMINNEAPOLIS MN, 55402 2215U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Diagnostic reagents composed of protein or peptide preparations for use in in vivo or in vitro cellular or antibody based diagnosis, for research purposes | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | Diagnostic reagents composed of protein or peptide preparations for use in in vivo or in vitro cellular or antibody based diagnosis, for medical and veterinary purposes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2007 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |