Drawing for SCOTTSDALE RESORT & CONFERENCE CENTER

USPTO serial 78233715

SCOTTSDALE RESORT & CONFERENCE CENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3124202Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 1, 2006
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with SCOTTSDALE RESORT & CONFERENCE CENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Constance G. Rhebergen

Constance G. Rhebergen Bracewell & Giuliani LLP711 Louisiana Street, Suite 2300HOUSTON, TX 77002-2770UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043resort hotel and restaurant services; providing conference and convention facilities and banquet facilities for special occasionsSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2017CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Aug 1, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2011NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2011C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 8, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 22, 2011E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 16, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 23, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Dec 12, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 18, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 18, 2005EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 4, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 2, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 10, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 10, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 9, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 25, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance