USPTO serial 78233844
ENCYCLOPEDIA OF WATER SCIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENCYCLOPEDIA OF WATER SCIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Abigail A. Rubinstein
DAVID M PERRY BLANK ROME LLP9TH FLONE LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, a comprehensive reference book in the field of water science that features effective procedures in agricultural water engineering and unveiling a wide spectrum of design concepts, methodologies, and solutions for enhanced performance of water quality, treatment, conservation, and irrigation methods, as well as improved water efficiency in agricultural programs | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 2003 |
| 041 | PROVIDING ONLINE PUBLICATIONS IN THE NATURE OF TEXT AND GRAPHIC WORKS OF OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF WATER SCIENCE CONCERNING THE MOST EFFECTIVE PROCEDURES IN AGRICULTURAL WATER ENGINEERING AND UNVEILING A WIDE SPECTRUM OF DESIGN CONCEPTS, METHODOLOGIES, AND SOLUTIONS FOR ENHANCED PERFORMANCE OF WATER QUALITY, TREATMENT, CONSERVATION, AND IRRIGATION METHODS, AS WELL AS IMPROVED WATER EFFICIENCY IN AGRICULTURAL PROGRAMS | ACTIVE | Aug 18, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TAYLOR & FRANCIS GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by TAYLOR & FRANICS BOOKS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Marcel Dekker, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ENCYCLOPEDIA OF WATER SCIENCE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |