USPTO serial 78233868
MAGCODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAGCODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Heidenheim, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neal E. Friedman
NEAL E FRIEDMAN DAVIS & BUJOLD, PLLCFOURTH FL 500 N COMMERCIAL STMANCHESTER NH, 03101 1151U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical sockets, electrical plugs, electrical power adapters, electrical switches, electrical cables and electrical connectors for subassemblies in machines and vehicles, electrical switching boxes and modules, electrical switch plates, connecting parts for electric conductors, namely, data connection modules, electrical connection boxes, electrical controllers, electrical connectors, electrical distribution boxes and automobile data connectors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |