USPTO serial 78234180
SVT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SVT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Becker
ROBERT W BECKER707 HWY 66 E STE BTIJERAS, NM 87059-7382UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Sensors and transmitting devices in the nature of transponders and antennas for the detection of an inflation pressure lose in automobile tires | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Pneumatic tires and tubes therefor; solid tires; solid rubber tires; land vehicle parts, namely, complete wheel assemblies, wheel rims, wheel covers, hub caps, valves for vehicle tires, and inner tubes for vehicle tires; run-flat systems and run-flat supporting elements for vehicle wheels, essentially consisting of supporting rings arranged in the tire to support the tire on loss of inflation pressure or ties with reinforced areas as well as sensors and transmitting devices in the nature of transponders, and antennas for the detection of an inflation pressure loss, sold as a component of tires; repair materials for vehicle tieres, in particular cover strips and patches made of rubber, adhesive parts and strips and tread compounds for retreading as well as rubber compounds for plugging holes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |