USPTO serial 78234296
AIRDAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2916814Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 4, 2005
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AIRDAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HILLSBOROUGH, NC
Optical Detection Systems, Inc.
Rapid City, SD
PANASONIC AVIONICS CORPORATION
LAKE FOREST, CA
Morrisville, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ron Irick
Ron Irick Panasonic Avionics Corporation26200 Enterprise WayLake Forest, CA 92630UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Collection and distribution of weather data in near-real time | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 5, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AIRDAT, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Optical Detection Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PANASONIC AVIONICS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by AIRDAT, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AIRDAT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 6, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 5, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |