Drawing for PURCHASE STREET

USPTO serial 78234681

PURCHASE STREET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURCHASE STREET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY BANKING AND CREDIT CARD SERVICES; PROVIDING CREDIT CARD, DEBIT CARD, CHARGE CARD AND STORED VALUE PREPAID CARD SERVICES; REMOTE PAYMENT SERVICES; STORED VALUE ELECTRONIC PURSE SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING ELECTRONIC FUNDS AND CURRENCY TRANSFER SERVICES, ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS SERVICES, PREPAID TELEPHONE CALLING CARD SERVICES, CASH DISBURSEMENT SERVICES, AND TRANSACTION AUTHORIZATION AND SETTLEMENT SERVICES; PROVISION OF DEBIT AND CREDIT SERVICES BY MEANS OF RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION DEVICES, NAMELY, VIA TRANSPONDERS; TRAVEL INSURANCE SERVICES; CHECK VERIFICATION SERVICES; ISSUING AND REDEMPTION SERVICES ALL RELATING TO MONITORING REIMBURSEMENTS OF TRAVEL, DINING AND BUSINESS OUTLAYS; PROVIDING FINANCIAL CONSULTING AND FINANCIAL SUPPORT SERVICES TO RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS THROUGH MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS MEANS, INCLUDING PAYMENT SERVICES THROUGH WIRELESS DEVICES; PROVIDING FINANCIAL CONSULTING AND FINANCIAL SUPPORT SERVICES TO ONLINE RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS THROUGH NETWORKS OR OTHER ELECTRONIC MEANS USING ELECTRONICALLY DIGITIZED INFORMATION; BILL PAYMENT SERVICES PROVIDED THROUGH A WEBSITE; ON-LINE BANKINGACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 17, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 10, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 18, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 4, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 15, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 12, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance