USPTO serial 78234810
DUALCHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 2, 2005
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DUALCHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy H. Hiebert
TIMOTHY H HIEBERT SAMUELS & HIEBERT LLCTWO INTERNATIONAL PL 23RD FLBOSTON, MA 02110-4104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical products for commercial and scientific purposes, namely, reagents for the visualization of binding reactions on necleotide arrays or peptide arrays; kits for commercial research and scientific purposes comprised of reagents for the visualization of binding reactions on necleotide arrays and peptide arrays | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Disposable laboratory articles, namely, nucleotide arrays and peptide arrays for the analysis of nucleic acids and peptides | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |