USPTO serial 78234844
ESIMPLYWELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHUO, EMILY M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ESIMPLYWELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER M BIKUS
PATRICK C STEPHENSON MCGRATH N MULLIN & KRATZ PC LLO1601 DODGE STSTE 3700 1ST NATIONAL TWROMAHA, NE 68102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely conducting a wellness program that focuses on prevention, wellness and self-care | ACTIVE | Apr 17, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SIMPLYWELL LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Paramount Group
- Other trademarks owned by Paramount Group
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ESIMPLYWELL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2007 | GSPS | NOTIFICATION OF SU - PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | GSPR | SU - PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | SPRA | SU - PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |