USPTO serial 78235064
INDUS VALLEY COTTON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INDUS VALLEY COTTON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Cushions; fitted fabric sofa covers; drapery hardware, namely traverse rods, poles, curtain hooks, curtain rods and finials | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Quilt covers, pillows, bed sheets, bed spreads, cushion covers, comforter shells, bed skirts, dust ruffles, unfitted fabric sofa covers, grand foulards, table linen, fabric kitchen linen; sateen bed sheets 180,200,250,310 and 340 threads counts; synthetic filled quilts, comforters and pillows; fabric baby linen namely, bumper pads, quilts, pillows, sheets, flannel blankets, cot covers, napkins; ready made curtains and drapery fabrics; coated dim out and black out coated linen, nylon, polyester and rayon fabric for curtains; coated linen, nylon, polyester and rayon fabric for roller and Venetian blinds; synthetic shower curtains | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Embroideries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IMC INTERNATIONAL LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by IMC INTERNATIONAL LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named INDUS VALLEY COTTON
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |