USPTO serial 78235384
SMIRNOFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 3, 2004
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMIRNOFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana Gilland
Dana Gilland Diageo801 Main AvenueNorwalk, CT 06851UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Diageo North America, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Diageo North America, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Diageo North America, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named SMIRNOFF
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2006 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Apr 30, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |