Drawing for PEC

USPTO serial 78236067

PEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jess M. Collen

JESS M COLLEN COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.THE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG 80 SOSSINING NY, 10562U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded CD-ROMs, videotapes, audiotapes and computer software featuring educational courses in the fields of accounting, finance, business management, securities and investmentsACTIVE—
035Providing learning management system tools, namely, retail store services and online retail store services in the field of software for use in content development, content cataloguing, user management, user profiling, account usage, account history, subscription options and commerce transactions, bundled into a software design enabling the delivery of privately branded/co-branded course ware, training materials, news and marketing content for organizations, corporate clients, partners, associations, at a general and targeted public on global and private and computer systemsACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting courses in the fields of Accounting, finance, business management, taxation, securities and investment, money management, technology, human resources, real estate, law, insurance, training, engineering, medicine, ethics, corporate culture and pain management by traditional and online means, and distributing course materials featuring professional and educational learning management systems and courseware in connection therewith; educational services, namely, presenting lectures, educational presentation, white papers, evaluations and examinations in the fields of accounting, finance, business management, taxation, securities and investment, money management, taxation, technology, human resources, real estate, law, insurance, training, engineering, medicine, ethics, corporate culture and pain management by traditional, online and electronic means, and distributing course materials and content support documentation in connection therewith via the global computer network, VHS, web casts, libraries, CD-ROMs, multimedia, broadcasts, audio, print, electronic book and subscription and news-based formats; providing courses of education, instruction, and learning at the graduate, continuing education, and specialty learning levels in the fields of accounting, finance, business management, taxation, securities and investment, money management, technology, human resources, real estate, law, insurance, training, engineering, medicine, ethics, corporate culture and pain management by means of seminars, lectures, print, correspondence courses, and the global computer network, and distributing course materials in connection therewith; videotapingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 4, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 12, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 29, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 18, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 18, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 1, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 4, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance