USPTO serial 78236399
IMAGEWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMAGEWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Concord Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane L. Gardner
LISA M MARTENS FISH & RICHARDSON PCPO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Accessories, components, and structural parts for automobiles, namely, air dams, ground affect parts, namely, side skirts and wheel flares, fascias, rocker panels, hoods, deck lids, spoilers and trim pieces, namely, trim strips, body side moldings, claddings, wheel opening moldings, stone guards and mud flaps | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of automotive parts | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering and design for others of automotive parts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |