Drawing for SIMPLY SERVE

USPTO serial 78236631

SIMPLY SERVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIMPLY SERVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John A. Waters

JOHN A WATERS VARNUM RIDDERING SCHMIDT HOWLETT LLPPO BOX 352GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501-0352UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Canned pureed meats, namely, beef, pork, turkey, and veal, for consumers with special dietary requirementsACTIVEJul 31, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 12, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 12, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 1, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Aug 18, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 18, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 12, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 18, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED
Jan 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 8, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance