Drawing for ICE MINT

USPTO serial 78237324

ICE MINT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYASH, SUSAN C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ICE MINT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda Heilman

LINDA HEILMAN RECKITT BENCKISER INC1655 VLY RDWAYNE NJ, 07470U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003All purpose cleaning preparations; general purpose cleaning, polishing and scouring preparations; toilet bowl cleaning preparations with disinfecting properties, namely, toilet bowl cleaner.ACTIVE—
005Disinfecting preparations for household and industrial use, sanitizing preparations for use in household and industrial areas, toilet bowl disinfectant, air freshenersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 10, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 10, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 10, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 7, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 1, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 16, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 14, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance