USPTO serial 78237609
THE GROOVE MONSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3177647Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 28, 2006
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE GROOVE MONSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oakland, CA
Oakland, CA
Oakland, CA
Oakland, CA
Oakland, CA
Oakland, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey Kerwin
JEFFREY KERWIN LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY KERWIN3911 HARRISON STOAKLAND, CA 94611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Musical Sound Recordings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 10, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DiPippo, Philip, A.
- Other trademarks owned by DiPippo, Philip, A.
- Other trademarks owned by DiPippo, Philip, A.
- Other trademarks owned by Paolino, Keith, J.
- Other trademarks owned by Paolino, Keith, J.
- Other trademarks owned by Paolino, Keith, J.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named THE GROOVE MONSTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |