Drawing for THE APPRENTICE

USPTO serial 78238195

THE APPRENTICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE APPRENTICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank M.Weyer, James M. Slominski, Todd N. Snyder, Catherine S. Sun, Maurice B. Pilosof, Obi I. Iloputaife

GARY A HECKER THE HECKER LAW GROUP PLC1925 CENTURY PARK E STE 2300LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services in the nature of an on-going reality based television programACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 11, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 11, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 27, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 16, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 16, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 7, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 31, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 21, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 27, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 17, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance