USPTO serial 78238348
EXACTLINE LASER TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3288562Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 4, 2007
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXACTLINE LASER TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Billie Jean Smith
Billie Jean Smith Michael Best & Friedrich LLP100 East Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 3300Milwaukee, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Circular saws, power miter saws, radial arm saws and laser devices used therewith, namely, laser line projection devices | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by One World Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks owned by One World Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks owned by One World Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named EXACTLINE LASER TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2013 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 27, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 9, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |