Drawing for EXACTLINE LASER TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 78238348

EXACTLINE LASER TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3288562Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 4, 2007
Examiner
CARTY, GEORGIA
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXACTLINE LASER TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Billie Jean Smith

Billie Jean Smith Michael Best & Friedrich LLP100 East Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 3300Milwaukee, WI 53202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Circular saws, power miter saws, radial arm saws and laser devices used therewith, namely, laser line projection devicesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDAug 31, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2013C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Sep 21, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 11, 2013C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Sep 11, 2013ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Nov 26, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Oct 24, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 27, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 23, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jun 29, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 4, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 4, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 9, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 27, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 27, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 27, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 30, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 20, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 1, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 4, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2003AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance