USPTO serial 78238442
HUMAN FLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HUMAN FLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gestion Giuseppe Ramacieri Inc.
Town of Mount-Royal, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott S. Havlick
SCOTT S HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART LLP555 SEVENTEENTH ST STE 3200 PODENVER CO, 80201U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | cinematographic film; prerecorded video cassettes, audio cassettes, audio tapes, and DVDs featuring musical performances | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Magazines in electronically, magnetically and/or optically recorded form; periodicals in the field of cinema, music, entertainment and sports | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely suits, jackets, pants, coats, shirts, sweaters, pullovers, cardigans, sweat suits, sweat shirts, sweat pants, track suits, shorts, blouses, vests, robes, socks, ties, hats, caps, toques, gloves, mittens, and bathing suits | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Sporting goods, namely snowboards, snowboard bindings, snowboard boots, leashes for snowboard boots, skate boards, skate board wheels, basketballs, volleyballs, soccer balls, water polo balls, softballs, baseballs, footballs, rubber action balls, tennis balls, beach balls, basketball backboards and basketball hoops, golf bags, golf shoe bags, golf balls, golf clubs, golf club head covers, golf towels, golf tees, empty water bottles, helmets, sports bags and backpacks, portable coolers, and flashlights; athletic goods, namely tote bags, backpacks, and knapsacks | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Candy and confectionary chips for baking | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely performing live stunts which feature wing walking or a person being strapped to a flying aircraft; entertainment services, namely providing live musical band performances in concert and providing musical performance in recorded form, by television and radio broadcasts on film and other recording media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gestion Giuseppe Ramacieri Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named HUMAN FLY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |