Drawing for THE HUMAN FLY

USPTO serial 78238476

THE HUMAN FLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE HUMAN FLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott S. Havlick

SCOTT S HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART LLP555 SEVENTEENTH ST STE 3200 PODENVER CO, 80201U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cinematographic film; prerecorded video cassettes, audio cassettes, audio tapes, and DVDs featuring musical performancesACTIVE—
016Magazines in electronically, magnetically and/or optically recorded form; periodicals in the field of cinema, music, entertainment and sportsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely suits, jackets, pants, coats, shirts, sweaters, pullovers, cardigans, sweat suits, sweat shits, sweat pants, track suits, shorts, blouses, vests, robes, socks, ties, hats, caps, toques, gloves, mittens, and bathing suitsACTIVE—
028Sporting goods, namely snowboards, snowboard bindings, snowboard boots, leashes for snowboard boots, skate boards, skate board wheels, basketballs, volleyballs, soccer balls, water polo balls, softballs, baseballs, footballs, rubber action balls, tennis balls, beach balls, basketball backboards and basketball hoops, golf bags, golf shoe bags, golf balls, golf clubs, golf club head covers, golf towels, golf tees, empty water bottles, helmets, sports bags and backpacks, portable coolers, and flashlights; athletic goods, namely tote bags, backpacks, and knapsacksACTIVE—
030Candy and confectionery chips for bakingINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
041Entertainment services, namely performing live stunts which feature wing walking or a person being strapped to a flying aircraft; entertainment services, namely providing live musical band performances in concert and providing musical performance in recorded form, by television and radio broadcasts on film and other recording mediaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 17, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 12, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 10, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 9, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2004GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2004CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 29, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance