USPTO serial 78238657
REDBUSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REDBUSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
The Redbust Tea Company LimitedChurchill House, 142-146 Old StreetLondon, EC1V 9BWUNITED KINGDOMGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Laundry bleach and other substances for laundry use, namely laundry detergent; general purpose cleaning, polishing, and abrasive liquids and powders; perfumery; hair lotions; dentifrices | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely flyers, newsletters, product guides featuring information relating to restaurant services; printed matter, namely flyers, newsletters, product guides featuring information relating to diet, health and nutrition excluding information on tea and tea products | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, coffee substitute; flour; preparations made from cereals, namely flour and cereal based snack foods, bread, pastries and confectionery items, namely frozen confections and candies; ices, namely flavored ices excluding tea flavored ices and flavored ices containing tea additives; honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder, salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces; spices; ice | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | Beers; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely soft drinks not including tea or tea flavoring; fruit drinks and fruit juices not including tea or tea flavoring; syrups for making fruit drinks not including tea or tea flavorings; preparations for making beverages, namely concentrates and powders used in the preparation of soft drinks not including tea or tea flavorings | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Redbush Tea Company Limited
- Other trademarks owned by The Redbush Tea Company Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named REDBUSH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |