USPTO serial 78238780
SEVEN 7
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEVEN 7?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CLARK D. GROSS
CLARK D. GROSS Law Offices of Clark D. Gross1800 Century Park EastSuite 600Los Angeles, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin soaps; perfumery, essential oils for personal use, cosmetics, hair lotions | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Scientific, electric, photographic; optical, and measuring apparatus and instruments and accessories therefor, namely cameras, calculators and radios; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images, namely video tape recorders, audio tape recorders, television receivers; eyeglasses, sunglasses, eyeglass and sunglass cases, frames, cords and chains, and decorative magnets | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry; clocks; watches; and precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, namely cufflinks, collar bars, tie tacks, bracelets, pendants, earrings, ornamental pins, money clips, keyrings, pill boxes, rings, necklaces, candle holders and stylized animal containers, namely, jewelry boxes in the shape of animals | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Combs and brushes for the hair and body; woodenware, namely, wooden cups, dishes, bowls, plates, serving platters, salad bowls, salad servers, cake servers, cups, saucers, and salt and pepper shakers; porcelain, arid china, namely, dishes, chargers bowls, plates, serving platters; cups, saucers, candlestick holders, ramekins, vases, pitchers; crystal and beverage glassware, namely glasses, pitchers, tumblers; baskets not of metal; ceramic and laminated accessories, namely, soap dishes, toothbrush holders, lotion pumps, baskets, salt and pepper shakers, casseroles; storage canisters not made of metal; slotted spoons; coasters not made of paper or table linen; cocktail shakers; non-electric coffee pots not made of precious metal; decanters; dinnerware, goblets, ice buckets, ice tongs not made of metal; mugs; paper plates; soap dishes, beverage stirrers, sugar bowls and creamers, namely, containers for serving cream not made of precious metal; tea pots not made of metal, serving trays not of precious metal, trivets; beverage glassware; wine glasses; goblets; candy dishes; bar accessories; namely, coasters not of paper or table linen, corkscrews, bottle openers, Wine coolers, martini pitchers, and vacuum bottles; shoe horns; candle holders not of precious metal; clothing brushes and waste baskets | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Textiles and textile goods, namely textile table cloths and napkins; bed blankets, beach blankets, bed sheets, towels, quilts and handkerchiefs | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, neckties, scarves, suits, hosiery, skirts, fur-trimmed coats, robes, beach and swimming cover-ups; tennis and golf dresses, warm-up suits, rainwear, capes, ponchos, hats, scarves, shawls, gloves, raincoats, slippers, bras; nightgowns, robes, scarves and shawls | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail stores; retail store services; mail order services; mail order catalogue services-- on-line ordering services-- on-line retail services; on-line retail store services; on-line catalogue services; on-line mail order services; all featuring clothing and accessories | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Seven Licensing Company, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Seven Licensing Company, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SEVEN 7
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 16, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 8, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 23, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |