USPTO serial 78239002
SEVEN 7
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEVEN 7?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clark D. Gross
Clark D. Gross Russ, August & Kabat12424 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1200Los Angeles, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin soaps; perfumery, essential oils for personal use, cosmetics, hair lotions | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Scientific, electric, photographic, optical, and measuring apparatus and instruments and accessories therefor; namely cameras, calculators and radios; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images, namely video tape recorders, audio tape recorders, television receivers;eyeglasses, sunglasses, eyeglass and sunglass cases, frames, cords and chains, and decorative magnets | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry; clocks; watches; and precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, namely cufflinks, collar bars, tie tacks, bracelets, pendants; earrings, ornamental pins, money clips;keyrings, pill boxes, rings, necklaces, candle holders and stylized animal containers | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Combs and brushes for the hair and body; serving spoons, serving forks and barbecue utensils being forks; woodenware, porcelain, and china, namely, dishes, chargers, bowls, plates, serving platters, cups, saucers, candlestick holders, ramekins, vases, pitchers; crystal and beverage glassware, namely glasses, pitchers, tumblers, vases; baskets not of metal; ceramic and laminated accessories, namely, soap dishes, toothbrush holders, lotion pumps, vases, baskets, salt and pepper shakers, casseroles; storage canisters not made of metal; slotted spoons; coasters not made of table linen or of paper; cocktail shakers; non-electric coffee pots not of precious metal; decanters; dinnerware, goblets, ice buckets, ice tongs not made of metal; mugs; paper plates; soap dishes; beverage stirrers, sugar bowls and creamers, namely, containers for serving cream not made of precious metal; tea pots not made of metal, serving trays not of precious metal, trivets; beverage glassware; vases; wine glasses; goblets; candy dishes; bar accessories; namely, coasters not of paper or table linen, corkscrews, bottle openers, wine coolers, martini pitchers, and vacuum bottles; shoe horns; candle holders not of precious metal; clothing brushes and waste baskets | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Textiles and textile goods, namely textile table cloths and napkins; bed blankets, beach blankets, bed sheets, towels, quilts and handkerchiefs | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, neckties, scarves, suits, hosiery, fur-trimmed coats, robes, beach and swimming cover-ups; tennis and golf dresses, warm-up suits, rainwear, capes, ponchos, hats, shawls, gloves, raincoats, slippers, bras, nightgowns | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services; mail order services; mail order catalogue services; on-line ordering services; on-line retail services;on-line retail store services; on-line catalogue services; on-line mail order services; all featuring clothing and accessories | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Seven Licensing Company, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Seven Licensing Company, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SEVEN 7
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 31, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 23, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| May 12, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |